Search
 
Advanced search  
En Español
CEP on social networks
Featured
Public Opinion CEP
CONTENT
Encuesta CEP, Noviembre-Diciembre 2011 All Survey La perspectiva del tiempo Database Catálogo de encuestas
All resources
Videos: Volver a leer...
Alfonso Gómez-Lobo: Lectura de clásicos griegos
Video destacado
Camila Vallejo y Francisco Figueroa en el CEP
Opinions
CEP MEMBERS IN THE PRESS
Vittorio Corbo
Más opiniones del autor
David Gallagher
Más opiniones del autor
Arturo Fontaine
Más opiniones del autor
Lucas Sierra
Más opiniones del autor
Authors
See more The economy according to Corbo Articles, conferences, seminars, audios opinions and Senior Researcher of the CEP, Vittorio Corbo. See more
Ver Sumario
Anticipo próxima revista
Lea sumario aquí
Topics
Politics
Environment and Urbanism
Culture and Society
Economy
Social Doctrines
Business and Finances
Social Policies
I want to receive notices of new publications and updates cepchile.cl.
Send








Ciclos CEP



















Back   Forward
Estudios Públicos: Nº 76, 1999. AUTONOMY, TOLERANCE AND THE DAMAGE PRINCIPLE Joseph Raz (author)

En Español
| Share

More of:
Joseph Raz

Joseph Raz argues in favor of a principle of tolerance that is compatible with a political morality he calls ‘perfectionism’. The foundation of the value of tolerance as a principle of politics lies in the idea of autonomy, according to which each individual has the right to pursue excellence in his life with respect to different virtues which are often mutually incompatible (moral pluralism) or even promote intolerance of other virtues (competitive moral pluralism). Respect for autonomy requires that individuals have the possibility to choose between different versions of the good life. Tolerance, in turn, requires non-interference in the choices that individuals make when trying to excel in their preferred virtues. Nothing of the previous, argues Raz, implies that any choice is equally good, nor that the State should permit whichever form of life. Nonetheless, the duties derived from the idea of autonomy are not limited to the duty of non-interference that corresponds to the concept of tolerance. The principle of autonomy also requires helping individuals to develop the capacities that allow them to lead an autonomous life. According to Mill’s damage principle, the State can only use coercion to prevent behavior that is harmful to others. It would seem, therefore, that the use of coercion for other purposes, for example for the collection of taxes, violates the damage principle. Still, from the point of view of autonomy, those acts or omissions are also harmful that, though not diminishing autonomy, prevent its increase. The damage principle, thus reinterpreted, clearly justifies a system of taxation to the extent that its revenues are used to further the autonomy of individuals. Finally, autonomy is only valuable when used to choose a good life. The State that advocates autonomy is therefore obliged to promote valuable alternatives as well as to repress other repulsive ones. The damage principle, nonetheless, sets a limit to the instruments that the State can use to such effect, and coercion can only be used under the conditions already mentioned.


More in
Estudios Públicos :: Index by Subject :: Social Doctrines :: Liberalism Estudios Públicos :: Index by Subject :: Politics :: Rights Theory Estudios Públicos :: Index by Number :: Estudios Públicos Nº 71-80 :: Estudios Públicos Nº 76

This article is not available in PDF

Back   Up

CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS PÚBLICOS
Monseñor Sótero Sanz 162 - Providencia - Santiago de Chile. Código Postal 7500011 | Teléfono: 328 2400 - Fax 328 2440
 
The material in this site can be only reproduced in accordance with Article 38 of the Chilean Law 17.336 on Copyright. Copyright Centro de Estudios Públicos © Santiago, Chile, 2011.
Permitida su reproducción en conformidad al artículo 38 de la Ley 17.336 sobre Propiedad Intelectual. Derechos reservados Centro de Estudios Públicos © Santiago, Chile, 2011.
All content on this website are the responsibility of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of its publisher and the Center for Public Studies.
Todos los contenidos de este sitio web son responsabilidad de sus respectivos autores, y no reflejan necesariamente la opinión de su editor ni del Centro de Estudios Públicos.
Editor de contenidos: Lucas Sierra I. - Editor gráfico: David Parra A.